Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think Paperback – August 28, 2007

My genetics are pretty good, so I've never been a "dieting" type person. I've never really watched my weight. And until recently, I had never really attempted to diet at all. But, after already being overweight by about 15 or so pounds, and then gaining an extra 30-some pounds due to doctor-prescribed, drug-induced steroids, I finally had arrived at the point to where I needed to lose (NOTE: At my heaviest, I weighed 192 lbs. – that's borderline "obese" for a man of my height (5' 8"). By the time I started my diet I weighed 183 lbs).Due to my health, I'm not able to do any real meaningful exercise that can contribute towards any significant calories-burned. So, after doing a little research, I discovered that a PORTION-CONTROL-ONLY type diet would probably work best. After committing to such a diet (June 2015), I found MINDLESS EATING on Amazon. Although not technically a "dieting" book, but more like a book on the science behind food marketing and WHY we eat, it was exactly what I needed. I picked it up about six weeks after my diet had started. Since that time, I have steadily lost 3.5 to 4 pounds a month. That's a slow loss, but it's a healthy loss.As of this review (Feb. 1, 2016), I have lost 27 lbs. in the last 7 months, and I'm well on my way to hitting the perfect weight range for my age, height and physical-makeup. I credit MINDLESS EATING for giving me the mental boost and an assurance that dieting WITHOUT EXERCISE, and dieting WITHOUT GIVING UP THE FOODS YOU LOVE, is really possible – I'm living proof.If you're new to dieting, have decent weight genetics, are in a position to where you're not able to exercise, and want an easy, fun-filled, no-nonsense, common sense read, then I believe that MINDLESS EATING is for you. Thank you, Mr. Wansink, for writing this book!UPDATE: My diet which used MINDLESS EATING as a guide to losing weight officially ended around May 1, 2016. I now weigh 143 lbs., with a total 11-month loss of 40 lbs. That's right, I lost a total of 40 POUNDS IN 11 MONTHS with NO EXERCISE and NO EATING OF FOODS I DIDN'T WANT TO EAT. Imagine losing 40 pounds in less than a year, eating only the foods you love. One short year from now you can be looking back at yourself and thinking – that didn't take so long.I am now maintaining my weight with the lessons I've learned (many from this book), and plan on using these lesson as way to always maintain the ideal weight for my particular body height and makeup. If I can do it, anyone can do it.5-STARS Highly Recommended!

This review is written by Andrew Siegel, M.D., author of Promiscuous Eating: Understanding and Ending Our Self-Destructive Relationship With Food, available on Amazon in paperback and Kindle.Mindless Eating offers some very practical and useful advice to anyone who is trying to lose weight or maintain a healthy weight. It is an informative and quick read that will leave you with a number of pearls to help you on your quest for health and wellness.Allow me to segue into the synopsis by starting with a short story. Yesterday morning I stopped at the International Food Market to pick up a few items. I wasn't hungry when I walked in, but the sight and scent of a smorgasbord of interesting foods literally made my juices flow. In accordance with the seminal work of Ivan Pavlov, even thinking of food makes us hungry as the salivary glands start secreting saliva and the pancreas starts secreting insulin. When I arrived home, I was compelled to have a mid-morning snack, and there was just no getting around it. All the mindfulness in the world wasn't going to stop my noshing and it is Brian Wansink's overarching thesis in his book that if we want to change our eating habits and behaviors, it is simply easier to change our environment than our minds. If I really didn't want to trigger my snack attack, perhaps I shouldn't have gone food shopping in mid-morning--it is always better to go grocery shopping after a meal!Wansink distinguishes between physical hunger and emotional hunger. Physical hunger is gradual, perceived in our stomachs, occurs hours after eating a meal and disappears when we are full; the eating experience when physically hungry is quite satisfying for most of us. On the other hand, emotional hunger is acute, occurs in our mind, is unrelated to how long ago we ate our previous meal, often persists after eating and may unleash secondary emotions including guilt and shame.Mindless eating--eating without careful scrutiny and deliberation--is a powerful force because we are often unaware it is happening and most of the time we are not cognizant of the quantity of food that we are consuming. Simply stated, our stomachs are bad at math and we don't get much help from our attention or memory. If we could see what we have eaten, we would probably eat less than we do. Wansink designed an experiment in which one group of people were given a standard serving of soup vs. a second group that were given a specially rigged "bottomless" soup bowl; interestingly, the former group consumed an average of 9 ounces vs. the latter group's 15 ounces! The moral is that many of us just do not know when to stop eating unless given external cues, such as a distinct portion that is served or observation of how much others in our dining group our consuming.If we think we are Masters of our food choices, it is merely an illusion. Our food preferences are predicated upon our habits, which can be both inherited and conditioned. Most of us know that fruit and veggies are good for us and fast and processed foods are bad for us, but we file this information under "things we know and choose to ignore." Our lives are full of eating "scripts"--habits that are an automated series of instructions carried out in a specific order such as the conditioned ritual of turning on the television, sitting in our favorite spot, salivating in Pavlovian fashion, and responding by arising to get popcorn and candy. A typical breakfast script is reading the newspaper and refilling the cereal bowl until we are finished reading. A common dinner script might be finishing the food on our plate and eating additional helpings until the others family members are done. Television and other forms of distracted dining, e.g., eating while driving (dashboard dining) are particularly dangerous because we really don't heed the quantity of food consumed nor how long we have eaten for.We tend to overeat because there are signals that tell us to eat, and it is not in our nature to pause after every bite and contemplate whether we're full. Culture wise, most Americans stop eating when achieving fullness as opposed to leaner cultures that stop eating when they are no longer hungry. Okinawans subscribe to the premise of hara hachi bu, defined as eating until 80% full. Studies have shown that French women pay more attention to internal cues like fullness as opposed to American women who, although regarding their sense of fullness, pay more heed to external cues such as the level of soup in a bowl.We consume more from bigger packages, whatever the food; the same is true with bigger dishes, bowls and spoons--the size of a bag or bottle tells us what we think a serving size should be. Since our brains tend to over-focus on height of objects at expense of width, a short/fat glass will typically result in 20% more poured than tall/thin glass. We tend to consume more if our expectations regarding the food quality are greater (halo effect); on the other hand, if our expectations are less, our enjoyment is less and we tend to eat less (shadow effect). We eat more when there is more variety to choose from, hence beware the all-you-can-eat buffet. Premeditative eaters eat more than impulsive eaters (the more we think about eating, the more we eat). We tend to eat more food if it is advertised as "low fat" or "healthy." Pause points, such as internal sleeves in packaged goods, tend to interrupt our eating and give us the chance to decide if we want to continue; so those internal sleeves in cookie packages really do serve a purpose.Clearly, based upon our poor ability to lose weight and maintain that loss, diets are not effective for the vast majority of people and there are some very good reasons for this. Diets are depriving, discouraging and demoralizing--our body, brain and environment fights against deprivation; metabolic changes occur with starvation that slow our metabolisms and thwart the weight loss; denial yields cravings causing the foods we don't bite to come back to bite us. The good news is that the same forces that lead us to mindlessly gain weight can help us mindlessly lose weight. Habit can defeat the tyranny of the moment. Wansink's premise is to re-engineer our environment and eating habits so that we can eat enjoyably and mindfully without guilt and weight gain. His mantra is: the best diet is the one you don't know you're on. The same levers that cause weight gain can be pushed to slowly promote weight loss--unknowingly. If we don't realize we're eating a little less than we need, we don't feel deprived. If we don't feel deprived, we're less likely to backslide and overeat to compensate. The key is the mindless margin--the zone in which we can slightly overeat or under eat without being aware of it. By heeding this mindless margin, we can trim 100-200 calories/day easily and unknowingly.So, we don't notice 100-200 calorie difference and can trim these calories easily and unknowingly and thus mindlessly eat better. Helpful strategies include food tradeoffs: I can eat x if I do y, for example, I can eat dessert if I exercise. Other helpful strategies include food policies including, for example: 20% less; no second helpings of starch; never eat at work desk; only eat snacks without wrappers; no bagels on weekdays; half desserts, etc.Analogous to public health measures that function to improve our health by re-engineering our environment with respect to sidewalks, bike lanes, parks, limiting fast food facilities, Wansink offers a number of re-engineering solutions for improving our home environment and eating habits that can help stem mindless eating:*Pre-plate entrees and snacks so we know precisely the amount we will be eating*Control our "tablescape" or it will control us: smaller plates, utensils, packages; slender glasses to keep us slender; the fewer side dishes and bowls put on the table, the less that will be consumed*Principle of invisibility--we eat more when food is placed in transparent wrap rather than in tin foil (out of sight, out of mind/in sight, in mind); as an extension, display healthy foods, hide unhealthy foods*Convenience principle: the more hassle it is to eat, the less will be eaten: shelled vs. unshelled nuts; chopsticks vs. standard utensils*Salience (conspicuous) principle: huge, warehouse multi-pack containers get in the way and beg to be eaten and pared down, so don't buy them*Change "eating scripts" from weight gain scripts to weight loss scripts: re-script dinner--start last, pace w/slowest eater, leave some food on plate, decide how much to eat before meal*Recognize that when we eat with others, we will eat more*Volume trumps calories--we eat the volume we want, not the calories we want; the two cheapest ingredients we can add to food are water and air*Serve entrée but put salad and veggies family style in middle of table*De-convenience tempting foods: back of refrigerator, top of pantry, etc.*Eat before shopping, use list, stick to perimeter*Split entrée; have half pre-packed to take home; have two appetizers in lieu of entrée; 2 bites of dessert (the best part of dessert is the first two bites)*Distract yourself before you snack*Don't deprive ourselves--allow comfort foods, but eat in smaller amounts; rewire comfort foods--instead of cookies, candy, chips, cake, try small bowl of ice cream with strawberries*For lunch and dinner, half of the plate should be veggies and fruit, the other half protein and starchAndrew Siegel, M.D.AUTHOR OF: PROMISCUOUS EATING--UNDERSTANDING AND ENDING OUR SELF-DESTRUCTIVE RELATIONSHIP WITH FOOD

The book, "Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Thank We Think" is a wonderful overview of the psychology of eating and how our brain responds to what we eat and why. There are great tips on managing weight, on fooling your genetic tendencies, on avoiding food traps and on food marketing manipulation. Wansink should know these things. He researches ways to sell more food to the masses.Wansink cites a study of educating Harvard students on a particular food trap and how a mere one month later most of the participants fell prey to that food trap. He tells us how abundance of variety makes us overeat--even if it is just multiple color candy, as opposed to one color, same flavor candy! Why eating in groups increases how much we eat. Why clearing away plates makes people eat more in restaurants. It is a fascinating look at our own behavior.How do we both outsmart our bodies and the food marketing industry? Wansink presents those answers. While I may not always heed the book's advice, at least I now understand why it is so hard to make food changes. He explains why people will lose more weight with a mere 100 calorie per day change than with extreme, complex diets and he provides a useful comparison of various diets in the back of the book.It is fun, fascinating and at moments made me cringe--as the forces behind the marketing are hard at work undermining our health.Mindless Eating may not be an industry tell-all book but it certainly reveals quite a bit. This book is not a food meditation book, but the science of how and why we eat what and when. It is a fascinating look at how our habits became habits. It is based in science and presented in amusing fashion. Very readable.