The Psychopath Inside: A Neuroscientist's Personal Journey into the Dark Side of the Brain

A must read for people who want to get a real insight to a psychopathic mind.

Es un libro genial, como su autor, un genio y muy sincero. Lástima no encontrar una edición en Castellano. De todos modos, es muy bueno y no es ficción, es real todo lo que describe. Tuve el honor de verle, escucharle e intercambiar ideas, gracias Dr.Fallon.

James Fallon, um conceituado neurocientista em um de seus experimentos rotineiros analisando cérebros de psicopatas com um grupo de controle de pessoas "normais" se descobre um psicopata! Ao separar os resultados dos cérebros de todos os tipos de psicopatas das pessoas "normais" ali estava o dele em meio a todos aqueles assassinos horripilantes!Um "paradoxo" interessante que dá no que pensar. Um sociopata/psicopata poderia exercer uma função social cooperando com a sociedade? Essa é a questão que paira no ar. Intrigante!

For decades now, neuroscientists have been seeking the answer the question, “What makes a psychopath, a psychopath?” In James Fallon’s, The Psychopath Inside, he wanted to uncover the answer to that question by studying the brains and genes of psychopaths. Unknown to him at the time, this research would lead him to make a detour towards having to re-evaluate his own personal life. Fallon is an accredited science writer who discusses his various projects that he has been working on in psychopathology, one of them being himself. With a background in neurobiology, he is a renowned professor in the department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior at the School of Medicine at the University of California, Irvine. Fallon is not shy about his work or family history and has been published in various articles such as The Wall Street Journal, been asked to speak at a national conference (TED), and was even contacted by the producer of the Criminal Minds television show due to his psychopathological findings. However, his most successful work is his book, The Psychopath Inside, acting not only as a factual and knowledge-based book, but an autobiography as well. The lurking question, “What is a psychopath?” lingers in conversation between researchers because it has yet to have an agreed upon definition. Fallon begins by acknowledging common facts agreed on by the majority of researchers: psychopaths lack empathy and disregard morals, right? Correct. Using these facts and his countless amount of research, Fallon discovers that there are not only areas in the brain that are similar between psychopaths, but also genetic sequences. James Fallon did a blind review of over a hundred PET scans which came from both average people and from those who were diagnosed as psychopaths. Looking closely at the various scans, he recognized a pattern in the scans of those deemed as psychopaths: a major loss of activity in the limbic (emotional) cortex of the brain. However, this pattern didn’t interest Fallon enough to pursue it further and he decided to continue with his other Alzheimer’s trial. During the Alzheimer’s trial, Fallon established a control group of brain scans who did not has Alzheimer’s, and these scans happened to be those of his family. Looking closely at his family scans, he noticed a similarity in a PET scan that looked familiar to him; it looked like a psychopath scan which he had studied previously. Turns out, the scan which he had been looking at was a scan of his own brain. After that finding, Fallon’s interest in psychopathology peaked. Looking at someone’s genetic pattern is like looking at a blue-print of a house someone is building. Genetics is the foundation of life, through which DNA plays a leading role. Basing his research under that model, Fallon began to look at psychopaths’ genetic patterns and compared and contrasted them. Fallon began to look closely at his origin: his family life, the environment he grew up in, and activities that he pursued throughout his lifetime. He asked a number of questions to his family and friends, through which Fallon concluded that he was a happy, spirited, and confident child throughout his youth. As many other neuroscientists have agreed upon, bed-wetting, playing with fire, and animal abuse are main causes of concern when a child is developing because this suggests they are likely to be psychopathic. Fallon disregards that statement because he believes that “boys will be boys” and they just happen to do these sorts of things or it could just be peer pressure. So with this being said, the problem still remained, why did his brain scan resemble one of a psychopath? Fallon develops a three-legged stool theory as a way to account for how a person becomes a psychopath. He establishes this theory based off of three parts: genes, a specific brain pattern, and childhood abuse. However, this theory does not fit all because Fallon’s PET scans resemble those of a psychopath yet he didn’t have any childhood abuse while growing up. Therefore, Fallon calls himself a “lucky psychopath”, because he was brought up in a loving family and was not raised to have these tendencies many psychopaths do. This is where my favorite part of the book comes into play because Fallon discusses how having psychopaths in society isn’t so bad. Who would have thought, right? For example, psychopaths are defined to have less stress because they aren’t empathetic to others and don’t care how others go about their lives. With this lack of stress, they have healthier immune systems are and less susceptible to diseases and can live longer and healthier lives for the most part. Also, with this lack of emotion, people with psychopathic tendencies can better lie and be able to get away with it, saving themselves potential trouble. Fallon’s book is unlike any other scientific novel because he not only incorporates facts and real-life PET scans, but also discusses his private life and family history. One should not be nervous to try to read this book because of its organization and ability to be followed easily. Fallon proves to do an excellent job describing his work and its significance and ties it back to how it relates to psychopathology. This leaves little to no room for a reader to get lost among his words. Through his writing, he provides many analogies for complex topics such as serotonin processes and activating systems which make it easy to understand, so lack of a neuroscience degree won't leave you lost and confused. After reading this book and even re-reading certain passages, I, without hesitation, would give it a 5/5 rating. I was drawn to the book immediately by the way in which James Fallon began introducing himself and establishing his authority on the topic of psychopathology. His unique style of writing, one that is easy to comprehend, attracted me to his book because I could follow along with the various new details he was using to support his findings. This book proved to be an insightful look into Fallon’s personal life and demonstrated to the reader how fascinating our brain truly is. It was eye-opening to learn how observations, thoughts, and emotions that plagued people throughout their childhood could make them more or less susceptible to psychopathy. Fallon pushed past the various controversies which the field of psychopathology held and stood his ground and continued his research, and he will soon hopefully unlock the mystery behind "psychopaths".

Thanks a lot for this vivid and , to some extent, torturing report things work in the realm of psychopathy. I could relate to most, if not all, “symptoms” or traits. It helps to explain a lot. And it’s reliving. What i do have has a name and I don’t need to be ashamed of it. It’s not bad, nor good. It is what it is. Thanks for bringing light to this topic.

A fascinating, scientific look at the brain using his own family history and genome to reveal the sources of criminal behavior. I had to read parts of it several times to really understand it. I’m still not sure about certain parts of the science, but it sent me off to investigate certain aspects beyond the book. I’ve watched several TED videos of the author and that helped my understanding. I especially liked his discussions of the „nature vs. nurture“ inquiries. Not only is „nurture“ fundamental to shaping the personality, and to developing empathy, it can prevent mass murderers who are born with a genetic predisposition having inherited the „warrior gene“, as he did. I was surprised to learn that empathy is not possible for some people, not simply that some individuals fail to develop it. I was an educator for 40 years. He affirmed many of the „best practices“ I learned in studying emotional and behavioral disturbance at the University of Minnesota. He makes a case for early childhood education to prevent criminal behavior, in the extreme range, but also demonstrates how vital the mother‘s mental health is during pregnancy, and how nurturing in the first three years of life sets human development for life. The exponential effects of loving and nurturing young children are awesome and terrifying in their potential to shape personality for the immediate person as well as to shape the next and future generations. I plan to read the entire book again.