ACACIA 92.16Wh Portable Power Station 25600mAh Camping Solar Generator,Lithium Battery Power with 100W AC,DC,USB QC3.0,PD 3.0,LED Flashlight Solar Power Bank for Home,Camping Emergency, Black

a rewop ot tcefrep eb dluow sihT .nosrep elgnisTo a a oF So far great. The AC inverter seems in-efficient, but the DC output let me magnet the 11v7amp supervooc car charger of my choosing, and now it has high efficiency high speed supervooc output. The ac port automatically shuts off when nothing is plugged in, so a smart plug for digital timers seems like a must. The strap makes a perfect cable loop to hold your favorite cable. Double sided taped a watch charger to the top and the reverse pressure on the strap maintains my watch in place for charging. Cool little package that fast charges via dual input in a little over 1.5 hours. 93wh/58 watts... Real capacity I got 89% efeciency over dc. Much better than my eb3a. Awesome to take on trips in the car, especially with that supervooc charger. (My car struggles). Works well on 19v solar panels, but 19v only. There is no variable range on solar input, flex solar 40watt mono-row panels for example have 19v DC output, and you use the USB to pick up the leftover 5-12 watts.

This thing has been a life saver. It’s got great power, easy to use and pack around. I bought it as a gift for my mom who uses it at craft shows to power everything she needs. Definitely comes in handy!

I purchased two of these units. Both units are made well and work. I performed several tests and the units come up short on advertised capacities. My test results below should be a guide and must not be considered as advice from an expert since I am not one.Test 1 - I charged bot units completely. I ran a 120V 6 watt ceiling fan. Both units ran for approximately 8.5 hours on the AC output.Test 2 - I charged both units completely. I ran a 12V 9.6 watt car fan. Both units ran for approximately 8.5 hours on the 12V DC output.Test conclusionsTest 1 - In accordance with this test, either the modified sine wave inverter's efficiency is approximately 55% (Average modified sine wave invert efficiency 75-85%), or the actual power station capacity is from 60 - 68 Wh. Advertised capacity is 92.16 Wh.Test 2 - In accordance with this test the power station capacity is approximately 81.6 Wh. This seems to be close to the advertised capacity if you consider an energy conversion efficiency of 88.5% (Average energy conversion efficiencies are from 70 - 90%)Test 3 - Attempted to run low wattage light from USB A port. The light is 5V 1 watt and would not power on.Test 4 - Successfully ran a 12V 9.6 watt car fan with a USB to 12 volt converter from both USB A ports. No endurance testing performed.Test 5 - Successfully ran a 12V 9.6 watt car fan with a USB to 12 volt converter from both USB C ports. No endurance testing performed.Test 6 - Successfully tested built in light. Works well for an emergency light. No endurance testing done.UPDATE 1/10/25Test 7 - Tested USB A with 5V 0.88A (4.4W) fan. Fan ran for approximately 18.5 hrs.Test 7 Conclusion - In accordance with this test the power station capacity is approximately 81.4Wh. This seems to be close to the advertised capacity if you consider an energy conversion efficiency of 88.3% (Average energy conversion efficiencies are from 70 - 90%)Test conclusionsBoth units produced nearly identical results. The modified sine wave inverter seems to have an incredibly low conversion efficiency. The USB A ports seem to have a minimum amperage to allow for power draw. Both units charged in approximately 3 hours with supplied wall charger.Even with the lower inverter efficiency I would still purchase these units base on the price I paid for them and the USB endurance tests. I would not pay full price for these units with these limitations.

Charges slow, fan is pound when using the AC plug, I question if the 27w usb C port is actually putting out 27w because it can’t power my wireless router so I had to use the DC port to cigarette lighter to cigarette lighter USB adapter to power my wireless router. The reason I gave it 5 stars is because it works. The battery will last 8 hours powering my WiFi router via the DC port but only about 5 hours max via the AC port. The tiny handle hasn’t broken yet so that’s great. It just works so as long as your hopes are low this won’t disappoint. Expect the fan to be loud when using the AC port, expect it to charge slowly and expect the usb to underperform. Would I buy it again, yes in a heartbeat, it gets the job done.

Make sure you test this unit immediately so you can return it to Amazon if it doesn't work or meet your expectations. I contacted Acacia directly to let them know that the unit is very loud and smells when in use. It is also under powered and can barely do 1 full charge on my laptop. Their response brings you in loops and ultimately tell you to contact Amazon which are unable to do anything if you're past 30 days.

Worked awesome for my camping trip

For the price and functionality, i have no complaints. As a matter of fact, I plan on purchasing another one..👍🏽

This power station scares me because I feel like I will run out of power very quickly, this is especially true when I use the AC port, even if I'm powering a small fan. The USC C ports are really fast and have been able to recharge my iPad Air 3-4 times before it is drained, I feel like I can comfortably charge my iPhone 15 about 6 or even 8 times. However, the AC seems very weak and I think that part of the reason is that the internal fan kicks in right away and draws a lot of power to keep it cool. Furthermore, the power bank seems to overheat very easily when using the AC port, I plugged in my laptop and this tiny power station only gave me about 15 minutes of power before all of the green lights started flashing and then it turned off. With that said, I,m sticking to only using the USB-Cs, as the USB-As seem to be finicky when I plug in small USB-A-powered electronics. I really want to like this brand and want to give their bigger power station a try, however, my expectations will be low.