The Real Inconvenient Truth: It's Warming: but it's Not CO2: The case for human-caused global warming and climate change is based on lies, deceit, and manipulation

Straight forward non-political facts on the major factors contributing to climate cooling and warming. Skips the political nonsense and hysteria about anthropogenic climate change.So this book is primarily about the science and is why it stands out so much as the most comprehensive book on climate change I have ever read. Of course it is somewhat condensed on each subject but it doesn't leave out the details as related to climate either. You will find this a great information book on climate change and all the natural influences that effect/change climate. So when I look at the science in this book, I find a "truth" that is indeed "inconvenient". I have looked for the truth like many have. Political science vs physical, meteorological, geological science, and simple laws of nature.....So here are the mathematical (actually proven and well established physical data) not models First of all the science is not settled (political stance) ......is far more complex than a political grand-stander pushing an agenda driven narrative proclaims.the facts;The main gases in the earth's atmosphere are Nitrogen 78%, Oxygen 21%, and Argon 0.93%. this leaves about 0.07 % for all other gases which are mostly greenhouse gases (so greenhouse gases might be considered trace gases?) Of the trace gases about 90-95% is water vapor. This is a variable (cloud cover evaporation etc.) so most political modeling (IPCC) leaves this out. hmm? Co2 is roughly 5-6 % of greenhouse gases. Out of this 5-6%, about 5 % is anthropogenic (man caused) So human caused Co2 is a trace of a trace occupying 0.003 % of the atmosphere. Of course I'm just breaking down the math but it does speak for itself (i didn't make it up in other words) So climate is complex and there are probably thousands of variables that can move the needle.... but how much can you move the needle on 0.003 % (man's influence) when the math gets done?. Should we blow up economies with hysterical political narratives? We have, right now, shocking reality, in what this "cart before the horse tactic" can do................... 70,000 scientists around the world says what any real scientist would say...The "science is not settled" and they have with 4.5 billion years of climate change on earth to draw from. so I read books, lots of them....If I want the truth I won't use google, and all other media sources on the information highway online that decide what information you should get. Read the book....and please don't let political ideology cloud your thought process. No one has proven this guy wrong and the real science loves debate.

Dr. Sangster’s book is most helpful in understanding and correcting the extraordinary popular delusion that humans are causing global warming and climate change that are dangerous to humanity, and amount to the biggest crisis of the present time.The organization of the book carries the reader from an introduction to the political and social context of the current controversy about climate, to the history of global climate over hundreds of thousands of years, and then to the relevant science itself. There is penetrating critical analysis of the science and of the history and techniques of dissemination of misinformation to the public about the science.This is an ideal book for readers looking for a clear, articulate, plain English explanation of the science relating to climate change.This book demonstrates that since the late 1980s climate science has become a dogma based upon a hodgepodge of unreliable statistics, arbitrary research techniques and politicized groupthink.Some of the quotations in the book are especially helpful to understanding the nature of the controversy, for example statements made by prime movers in the establishment of the United Nations program to study not the possibility of and causes of a warming climate, but rather “to assess . . . the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change.” With those words as its reason for existence the United Nations climate organization became an advocate for a hypothesis rather than an investigator of the validity of the hypothesis.The author’s careful discussion of the underlying science is illuminating—in explaining not only the science but the tampering with data and the misuse of computer modeling as data rather than as a tool to analyze data.

Very educational and interesting

Gives a great perspective into the ongoing UN and Geeen agenda to spin the carbon narrative in order to create over zealous climate policy and to control people and land use....

It is a good book to combat some of the climate hysteria and brainwashing, but the climate change zealots will dismiss it without reading, sadly.

El libro deja en evidencia las falacias de la teoría oficialista del cambio climático y lo hace sin sectarismo, ni con el tono mesiánico y definitivo que emplean muchos en el bando escéptico. Reconoce que las ciencias del clima son complejísimas y que aquí hay pocas verdades absolutas. Hay algún capítulo en el que el material es denso, como cuando habla de las corrientes oceánicas o las nubes, especialmente si el inglés no es tu lengua materna. Pero se entiende todo bastante bien. El único punto flojo es la edición, que es un poco cutre, como de libro impreso en casa, sin desaprovechar ni una cara de folio en blanco, con unos márgenes escasos y tabulaciones un tanto extrañas. Pero en todo caso, se lee bien, los gráficos e ilustraciones están bien impresos. En general, un libro muy recomendable una vez superas ese pequeño obstáculo de la edición.

Should be compulsory reading in all schools.

The mass media needs to stop fighting against data driven evidence. This book is another work fighting the accepted “science” which is often actually not scientific, just going along with the crowd.