

Full description not available
T**M
Textbook for graduate student
My son needed the book for his graduate studies in engineering
J**E
Five Stars
excellent edition
M**H
Fine for casual perusal, too light for class
My continuum mechanics course uses this as one of the main textbooks, and I wish it were meatier. I wish the practice problems went from something concrete before going totally abstract.
L**R
A keeper, but not a starter
Concise is an understatement. This book is very dense. Beyond grouping topics into chapters, there is little organizational sense. Each section is a bit of "theory" and then several worked "problems," which aren't really problems...they are more proofs and theory. Not to say that the problems aren't useful. Chadwick covers general continuum mechanics, and takes brief detours into both the solid side and the fluid side, so everyone will get something out of the book. Take note, all you engineers like me: Chadwick lets the physics fall out of the math, as opposed to using math to describe the physics, and in that regard, I find the book very cumbersome.I think this book is best used as a supplement to a course and/or another mechanics book, or a "quick reference" kind of thing. The discussions are too brief to be of use to the initial student of mechanics. Because the apparent emphasis is on conciseness, you need to read very carefully...and flip back and forth to results in other parts of the book. The obligatory "mathematical preliminaries" section of mechanics books is here for precisely that reason- it's obligatory. It's pretty easy to see why this book is fawned over by many mechanicians...if you need to revisit some basic theory or proof as part of some other later work with modern mechanics, this is probably exactly what you're looking for.
N**E
it could potentially be a good reference as it does seem to contain quite a ...
For learning continuum mechanics without another solid resource, this book is awful (a really unfortunate choice for an introductory course). That said, it could potentially be a good reference as it does seem to contain quite a bit of info presented VERY tersely.
R**.
Not a Reference Book
I originally bought this book as a reference when I was taking my FEA graduate school course to supplement some of the concepts, namely tensors. I found the book hard to follow since it did not have detailed examples worked out; this may be suitable for more advanced graduate level courses (i.e. doctorate level).
T**O
Good supplement
This book can be a good supplement for a continuum mechanics text. Some parts are really good (for example the derivation of energy balance). A very good part of this book is the part in kinematics(second chapter) where he derives the transport equation in a very neat manner. This comes to good use later in the chapter on balance laws. The section on jump conditions is a good addition which is not found in many similar books. The last chapter on constitutive relations is really good. Just that chapter is worth the price.There are two things that I did not like from this book. The first one is the author glosses over the Cauchy theorem (traction = stress tensor*normal vec.) by just giving a reference to another book. Come on!!! This is a very important component of stress analysis. He should have derived it in the book. In the later editions he puts it in the appendix and doesn't say anything about that in the main text. Poor organisation! The other one is he relies almost entirely on dyadic notation. I would have liked if he gave the equivalent forms in index notation which many people, including myself, tend to understand better.Use this book together with Ogden's "Non-linear Elastic Deformations" and you got your self a good continuum mechanics library for less than USD 40.
B**M
more like an expansion of the class notes
It is concise, however it is not a book for selfstudy, more like an expansion of the class notes. Not limited to solid mechanics and written to provide general insight
Trustpilot
Hace 2 semanas
Hace 3 días
Hace 2 meses
Hace 3 semanas