Rewriting Scripture in Second Temple Times (Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature (SDSS)ature)

This book is deep but conversational. I enjoy listening to books and wish Dr Crawford’s work was on audible.

Lets face it, once we have read the Penteauch and then read other writings from the Second Temple Period we reread similar stories, themes and ideas in these books. It's soon obvious that scribal copying took place with omissions or additons occuring inside these writings. It's assumed the first five books of Moses (TORAH) was written first then later came these additional books many of which were found in Qumran. Such "Rewritten Bible" texts were first of all termed as such by Geza Vermes (1961) but our author Sidnie White Crawford will prefer "rewritten scripture" due to its nonanachronistic sense of not using "Bible" (as many of these writings had not reached canonical scriptural status and as such much interpretaive fluidity still ocurred. 9 ). Crawford will focus on five writings she thinks have this rewritten status: "Reworked Pentateuch" (Chapter 3); "The Book of Jubilees" (Chapter 4); "The Temple Scroll" (Chapter 5): "The Genesis Apocryphon" (Chapter 6); and in chapter 7 she discusses "4QCommentary on Genesis A." Of course the Scribes were the ones who either added, subtracted or interpreted previous material. What they did was perfectly the norm according to Crawford and to do, as in the case of the Jeremiah texts we have, was "to rework the existing tradition into a new, perhaps updated, edition" (4). Thus some of the underlying themes Crawford argues for in this book is scribal intervention, interpretation, insertions and harmonization (40). Nevertheless, she argues "their tradition of interpretation was accepted as authoritative by one stream of Judaism in the Second Temple period" (57).Thus when she discusses the "Reworked Pentateuch" she notes how outside material was brought into these texts along with "a scribal tradition of harmonizing exegesis" (40 & 42). However when we look at Jubilees and the Temple Scroll we see new compositions different from the Pentateuch. Crawford discusses therefore, if these books had scriptural status at Qumran and answers after much important evidence that Jubilees achieved divine, authorititave status among the Qumran sect (82), while the Temple Scroll was composed as a "new book of the law" and was meant to stand beside the Pentateuch as "equally authoritative", "there is no solid evidence that the TS ever gained community acceptance...as a work of Scripture. Its status as Scripture remains at best uncertain." (102)Crawford spends the remaining pages discussing the Genesis Apocryphon and 4QCommentary on Genesis A because she sees further development and transition taking place. The GA because it was the "farthest removed from the scriptural text being written in Aramiac and it made no claim to divine authority as Jubilees and the Temple Scroll did. 4QCommentary finally is seen utilizing its explicit exegesis of "citation plus comment" later becoming in vogue (130).All in all Crawford does an excellent service for us in beginning with the text of the Pentateuch and as a narrowing river constantly narrowing, ends her book with stating that Philo's "liber Antquitatum Biblicarum was the latest example of Rewritten Scripture. All other forms disappeared except citation plus commentary as later Jewish texts and the NT proves (142).

Great Deal

this is not a product whose quality one can assess. It's a fine academic presentations of a subject that interests me.

A slim but useful volume. As someone not specializing in DSS, I especially appreciated the in-depth discussion of Samaritan Pentateuch texts and sectarian documents from the Qumran caves. Should be interesting not only to those studying DSS, but those wrestling with issues of text criticism, source criticism, and the interface between the two.